Newsletter and Grammar Coach
NOVEMBER 2023 | Vol. 27, No. 11
Monthly information digest for EditPros clients and friends
EditPros LLC is commemorating 30 years in business.
Call us weekdays: 530-759-2000
|
CONTENTS
FEATURE: The origin of the term “disinformation” is not surprising
GRAMMAR COACH: Fielding our readers’ questions
REFERRAL REWARD: Recommend a friend — and earn up to $500
 
|
Of all possible subject matter, semantics rarely makes the top 10 in water cooler discussion topics — that is, if enough people have even returned to offices to meet at the water cooler (and if the office still even has a water cooler).
That aside, one topic with top-10 workplace discussion potential is the distinction between the terms “misinformation” and “disinformation.” The noun “disinformation” has become commonplace these days, in news stories, online posts and office memos. The Merriam-Webster Dictionary traces the origin of the term “misinformation” to the year 1605, while “disinformation” is a much newer term, with first use not recorded until 1939. The dictionary’s etymology capsule cites a source attributing the origin of the disinformation concept to an intelligence strategy hatched by the KGB, the Soviet Union’s key espionage agency. Despite a three-century head start, prevalence of the term “misinformation” is losing ground to increased references to “disinformation.” Our Google search for the term “misinformation” yielded 125 million results, while “disinformation” netted a respectable 67.9 million results.
Even though some people may casually use the terms interchangeably, they have distinct and contrasting meanings.
Misinformation, according to Merriam-Webster, is “incorrect or misleading information,” while it defines disinformation more narrowly and explicitly: “false information deliberately and often covertly spread (as by the planting of rumors) in order to influence public opinion or obscure the truth.”
Webster’s New World College Dictionary, upon which the Associated Press Stylebook relies, lacks an entry for the term misinformation but defines the verb misinform as “to supply with false or misleading information.” It characterizes disinformation as “false information spread deliberately, specifically by a government, in order to mislead enemies or to mold public opinion.”
The Associated Press Stylebook adds this amplification: “The term misinformation refers to false information shared about a particular topic that could be mistaken as truth. It can include honest mistakes, exaggerations, and misunderstandings of facts, as well as disinformation, which refers to misinformation created and spread intentionally as a way to mislead or confuse.”
Some people may fail to make note of the semantic distinction between misinformation and disinformation because the dis- and mis- prefixes are synonymous in connection with some other root words.
Consider the word distrust. As a noun Merriam-Webster defines distrust as the lack or absence of trust, and as a verb it means to have no trust or confidence in a person. The dictionary terms the noun mistrust as a lack of confidence (and identifies distrust as a synonym), while as a verb it means to lack trust or confidence in someone, or to doubt the truth or validity of something or someone. The distinction between distrust and mistrust is so slight as to be inconsequential. Both fundamentally and equally refer to skepticism.
Similarly, Merriam-Webster assigns synonymous meaning to the verbs mislike and dislike. The verb misorder means to arrange items incorrectly, the result of which is disorder — disruption of a systematic arrangement. Neither misorder nor disorder is necessarily intentional — unlike disinformation.
In contrast, some root words take on entirely divergent meanings with “dis” and “mis” prefixes. For example, your boss may appreciate your obtaining a discount (fee reduction), but may be unhappy if your inventory contains a miscount (mathematical error). If you misuse something you’re using it for the wrong purpose or in the wrong way, while if you disuse it, you stop using it altogether.
The prefix dis- is derived from Latin, in which the term meant “away from” or “apart.” In contemporary English use, dis- changes a word into its opposite — distant from the original meaning, evident in terms such as disconnect and disagree.
The prefix mis- originated with a German term that meant “changed from” or “astray.” As an English prefix, it indicates that something is being used or something has occurred incorrectly, as in “misfire,” “misinterpret,” “misspell” and “misbehave.”
Some “mis-” words have no “dis-” counterpart. Something can be mistreated but not distreated; you can misspeak but not disspeak. An object can be misshapen but not disshapen. Even though you may misunderstand something, you can’t possibly disunderstand it. You can disable a piece of equipment, but you can’t misable it. Your phone battery can be discharged but not mischarged. You can disagree but not misagree with someone. That may disappoint (but not misappoint) you. You can disband your organization, but don’t bother trying to misband it. That would create discord, without possibility of miscord. You can disclaim any responsibility for this commentary, but you can’t misclaim it.
We enjoy these chats with you around the water cooler.
How can you expect to reach your full potential when you settle for living beneath your means? How can you fulfill your obligations to your existence when you aren't even living within your purpose? How can you question the lack of prosperity and counterproductivity that are preventing your life from moving forward, while burdened by poor decisions you made in the past?
Life can approach you on its own terms, through various circumstances and situations, through many ups and downs, through a variety of failures, successes, hardships and headaches. All of these unpredictable variables that life delivers distill to one common denominator, one single person — the one you see daily in the mirror. Yes, you alone are the master architect of the foundation, structure, building and design of your life.
After Kenneth Williams came to that realization and determined how to surgically dissect his personality flaws and rectify his path to improve his life, he decided to document his thought processes so others could benefit. He did so in his book Be The Greatest You! — which he published with the help of our BookPrep service. Calling upon his own experiences and deep self-analysis, he crafted this self-help book to guide you through self-discovery and constructive thought processes to set you on a new path on which you can find the motivation and inspiration to Be The Greatest You!
As part of the BookPrep package, EditPros professionally formatted the interior pages of the book, designed its cover, and readied the work for print publication. EditPros also formatted and converted the book files into e-book formats for sales through Amazon (Kindle), Apple (iBooks), Barnes & Noble (Nook), and Kobo, by means of submission to IngramSpark's e-book service.
This is the 53rd book that BookPrep has produced for authors during the past seven years. With BookPrep, authors retain all rights to their books, and collect 100% of sales royalties.
We invite you to LEARN MORE about the EditPros BookPrep service.
Roger D. wrote:
I’m increasingly noticing what I consider misuse of a phrase involving the word “connection.” I’m referring to the phrase “in connection to.” For example, a U.S. Justice Department news release began with this headline: Four Alleged Fentanyl Traffickers Arrested in Connection to Army Spouse Death. I always thought the proper phrase was “in connection with,” but I’m seeing and hearing more and more news stories talking about something “in connection to” something else. Is that phrasing grammatically correct?
The grammar coach replies:
Roger, the customary idiomatic phrase is “in connection with.” We verified that by checking five dictionaries: the Merriam-Webster Dictionary, Webster's New World College Dictionary, the American Heritage Dictionary, the Cambridge Dictionary and the Collins Dictionary. Under the entry for the noun “connection,” all five showed the idiom “in connection with,” but did not acknowledge the phrasing “in connection to.” That's simply an example of misuse (or unconventional use) that has become popularized. An idea may be in opposition to a conflicting concept, but may have been developed in connection with a compatible theory. In the interest of consistency with traditional use, we favor “in connection with” and we discourage the phrasing “in connection to.”
* * * * *
Are you perplexed by some aspect of grammar or word usage? Don't be shy! Ask the "grammar coach" at EditPros and we'll try to help — at no charge, just for the sport of it.
Do you know of a friend or colleague whose office can benefit from EditPros’ services? If you do, you may be able to earn a “referral reward” of up to $500 from EditPros.
We invite you to submit your questions to the "grammar coach," and we welcome you to subscribe to this monthly newsletter — which we'll send to your e-mail address at no charge. We respond to all "grammar coach" questions personally, but delays may occur because we must place top priority on assignments from our clients. We appreciate your patience and your interest.
You also can change your e-mail subscription address. For an address change, please indicate your existing AND your new e-mail address. Thank you.
OUR PRIVACY POLICY for e-mail newsletter subscribers:
We do not use any commercial e-mail lists or automated mass-mailing programs, and we do not allow access to the list by anyone else for any reason. Our subscriber list is maintained by hand, and it is not for sale. We are protective of confidentiality because many of our readers are also clients of ours.
Meet EditPros co-owners Marti Smiley Childs and Jeff March.
The EditPros office is in the university town of Davis, California.
Our clients over the years have spanned a broad range of fields.
Normally we write about our clients, but many of them have written “thank you” notes to EditPros.
Earn a reward for recommending us.
Our separate
Book Prep service helps writers become self-published authors and guides them in managing their books.